Skip to content
[ HEAD-TO-HEAD · UPDATED 2026-05-18 ]

Wan 2.2 vs HunyuanVideo vs LTX-Video

Local video diffusion at three VRAM tiers.

Wan 2.2 is the new open-weight quality leader. Hunyuan still has the most cinematic motion. LTX-Video is the only one that's practical on a 16 GB card.

Decision briefing

Choose Wan 2.2 when

Best open-weight video quality right now. Strong I2V and T2V

The cost of that choice

14B model is VRAM-hungry. Generation times measured in minutes per clip

Choose HunyuanVideo when

Cinematic motion. Strong prompt adherence

The cost of that choice

Heavy VRAM. 5-second clips at 720p still take minutes

Choose LTX-Video when

Fast for a video diffusion model. Fits 12–16 GB

The cost of that choice

Lower fidelity than Wan/Hunyuan. Motion can be janky

Switching costs people miss

The feature table is only the starting point. Before moving, inventory saved projects, model formats, extensions, prompts, automation hooks, and collaborators who depend on the current workflow. A nominally stronger tool can be the worse choice when migration breaks a stable production path.

  • Workflow portability: confirm whether projects export as reusable files or remain tied to a hosted account.
  • Ecosystem fit: check required models, nodes, plug-ins, and version pinning—not only headline features.
  • Hardware and recurring cost: compare local VRAM/RAM requirements with subscription or API limits over a realistic month.
  • Exit plan: preserve source assets and settings so a pricing or licensing change does not trap the project.

How to use this comparison: eliminate options that fail a hard constraint first, then choose between the survivors using the scenario cards above. Scores are editorial signals described in our methodology, not laboratory benchmarks.

[ NEXT STEP ]

Turn the comparison into a hardware-filtered recommendation for your goal and platform.

Build your stack →